Saturday, January 22, 2011

Advertising

Dear friends,

It has come to my attention that I can allow advertisements to appear on the sidebar of the blog. I do not expect to make very much money, but I figure if I can, why wouldn't I? However, as I have neither a U. S. mailing address nor a bank to cash the cheques at, I am sending the proceeds to the Animal Control Officer of my father's hometown of Falmouth. He is a family friend and the Town Hall bureaucrat's tend to not give him much credit. I have no qualms with allowing a few advertisements if the profits go to a good man. Here is a picture of his dog:

Sunny-Dog, still somewhat shell-shocked since the budget cut.

[Update: I did not like the advertisements. They are gone now. Godspeed, Sunny.]
[Second Update: Disregard first update.]

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Response to Dr. Tisdall's Banning from Campus

On January 7th, Dr. Philip Tisdall arrived at the Elm Street Mezzanine to find a few early bird students and a new comer, a young adult male of African descent with very formal posture and dress. The man introduced himself as Mr. Islam, a member of faculty recently hired in a multicultural capacity related to Muslim students, himself being Muslim. As they chatted, it struck Dr. Tisdall that Mr. Islam had a unique rhythm to his speech. This being the Academy, with its international student body, and Islam being a recent addition to America’s religions, Dr. Tisdall asked Mr. Islam where he was from. Mr. Islam drew himself up and pronounced he was from Philadelphia. Dr. Tisdall told him that he would not have guessed that from his speech pattern, and they discussed his error. Mr. Islam noted that he had come from a long line of preachers, which made sense to Dr. Tisdall, as African-American churches had always struck him as a unique subset of American culture. By this time everyone had arrived and the meeting had started. Knowing that Mr. Islam was new, Dr. Tisdall made a very clear announcement of the Club’s only rule: Don’t be offended.

By January 15th Dr. Tisdall had been officially banned from campus, courtesy of Dr. Curwen, the Academy’s Dean of Faculty, on the premise that he had told Mr. Islam something to the effect of that he had never heard a black from the Philadelphia projects speak so eloquently before. From the accounts I have been given by Dr. Tisdall and Dean Walsh, the only student present throughout the entire encounter, there appears to have been a gross distortion of what actually happened. Despite these unsettled details, within a week the de facto nucleus of the Republican Club – a man who had voluntarily served for six years as our teacher, mentor, and friend, had quietly slipped off into the dark. As anyone who has sat through a frustrated round of Harkness knows, there comes a time when you must tear off your mask and call people out on their shit. I believe that our administrators have crossed the line. Yes, the school is theirs and they have the right to run it as they see fit. But as long as I am able to evade Room 101 I intend to use whatever powers I have as a student to stand against what I see as wrong.

Club members often say that they have a difficult time commenting on race at the Academy because they feel that their views are externally defined by liberal stereotypes about Republicans. In this way, we live with dualistic conceptions of self: one that is produced and interpreted by ourselves, and another, a “myth” forced upon us by an oppressive society that produces and interprets its own perception.

I believe that a multicultural school must accept that we are different. Culture is everything that does not need to be explained. What is the purpose of subsidizing the $73,000/year tuitions of youth from every quarter if asking them about their different cultural axioms is deplored as taboo? Did I misinterpret the phrase “embrace our differences?” Treating everyone equally is quite different than treating everyone as though they are the same. Culture matters. When the foremost indicator of poverty is the absence of one’s biological father, how can we so swiftly ignore the plight of the inner-city African American family unit? Why is it so terribly inappropriate to question the effectiveness of welfare cheques funded by coercive taxation when such programs have been in effect since LBJ’s 1964 War on Poverty? Why must functional questions be consistently misconstrued as discriminatory? Is there really nothing to be learned from our African Americans, Koreans, and Indians, our Jews, Muslims, and Hindus, our rich and our poor? I do not know Mr. Islam well enough to pass any judgment on him personally, but why, when asked how his community viewed caring for its elders in the midst of a social security discussion, did Dr. Tisdall have to practically go through a thesaurus to find the right synonym for “community?” Why was Mr. Islam’s immediate response, “What do you mean by my community?”

When the sincere interest in other cultures is co-opted by a group of self-important intellectuals absorbed in a self-affirming, “I’ve done my part” circle jerk, what has been won? Tolerance is a one-way deal for liberals – they have all of the rights and none of the responsibilities. It’s tacitly engineered that way. At some point, all this cannot go on, and we will have the academic version of September 2008 — as parents no longer choose to spend $200,000 to send their children to a 4-year prep school in which they will be likely indoctrinated that they should oppose the very American institutions that created the wealth and freedom that fuel our endowment and pay our faculty. The “best of the best” seem to be unaware that after some 2,500 years of both experience with and abstract thought about Western national economies, we know that a free, private sector increases the general wealth of a nation, while a statist redistributive state results in a general impoverishment of the population.

The Republican Club was never really about being Republicans, it was about having a safe haven where we could be honest and know that our intentions, however clumsy our expression, would not be mistaken. Will we ever feel safe there again? Who cares what it is called if the Thought Police are there – will we ever feel free to speak our minds? What then is left? Over the past years, that's years, the Club was always a place we could feel free to say the things that were on our hearts, but punishable by our liberal teachers if said in class. The Club was about trust. If Dr. Tisdall can be "banned" for something he didn't say and isn't true, that Club has ended. The Academy has done irreparable damage to its claim of being an institution of intellectual openness, multiculturalism, and diversity by stifling discussion of diversity and acting punitively toward an intellectual minority.

Of his childhood surroundings, David Lynch recalled, “It was a dream world, those droning airplanes, blue skies, picket fences, green grass, cherry trees – Middle America the way it was supposed to be. But then on this cherry tree would be this pitch oozing out, some of it black, some of it yellow, and there were millions of red ants racing all over the sticky pitch, all over the tree. So you see, there’s this beautiful world and you just look a little bit closer, and it’s all red ants.”

– Jimmy

Sunday, January 16, 2011

More Notes from Previous Club Meetings

[Quite a few of us jot down notes during meetings. Try to post them here is you get the chance, especially since most of us view different things as worthy and miss a lot.]

Note: These are mostly fragments because I just use my phone's notepad.

Sputnik was different, because you could walk out onto your lawn and say, "Fuck, the Russians are up there!"

Soviets and Americans stealing German intellectual property at end of WW2. V2 rocket engineers were divvied up between the two superpowers, and during the Korean War both sides had almost identical fighter planes.

Nazi rocket scientists in Alabama.

If you can steal intellectual property, you can leap a culture centuries forward.

Judeo-Christian Greeks vs. Confucians

Egypt is still pretty much Pharaonic. (Example of middle class which has not tried to gain political power)

Performance = Talent X Effort^2 X Directed Effort^3

Ignorance = Not knowing
Incompetence = Not knowing that you don't know

I am comfortable, and I fear success not failure (Tisdall's psychoanalysis of me)

Stock value = Profit X Social Construct

The difference between good people and bad people is that good people figure out how to solve their problems.

Whenever there is government which brings about an unequal distribution of power between groups and individuals within a state [definition of politics], special interest groups will always focus their energies on capturing its power. The greater the power of government, the more energy special interests will spend trying to capture it.

Don't worry about your car not meeting environmental standards. Because oil is fungible , any less gas your car uses will simply make it cheaper for everyone else by the law of supply/ demand. The truth is that all of the oil is going to be burned up.

Mitigation

The only monopolies ever to exist were biological: Chinese tea, Brazilian rubber, and Dutch nutmeg. They did not last for very long.

Rent Seeking

Happiness is mostly correlated to hope

Happiness is only seen in hindsight

You say that you want my money because you will use it to help them. I don't trust you're intent. I think you just want my money. If you needed it, why didn't you offer to shovel snow off my driveway?

Willingness to perform simple manual labor is a good indicator of need vs want

The greatest inequality brings the greatest growth. See: USA 1890, at paradigm.

Anything you are given that you have not earned corrupts you. But you cannot tax inheritance and trust society to solve the corruption.

The Wire (show)

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Blog Title

Could we please rename the blog 'Phillips Exeter Academy Republican Club"? Not everyone is an anarchist or libertarian on the site, notably the very man who runs it (Jimmy, your stance on women shows you are, at least to some degree, conservative.) It misrepresents us. I also want to bring up the fact that being Republican gives our discussions purpose and makes for good clash with the liberals.

Also, could we change the sub-quote to something a little more professional. How about "America is too great for small dreams" - Reagan or "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." - Jefferson

Monday, January 10, 2011

Some Reading

An article which has been flying around the asian communities:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704111504576059713528698754.html

and a lecture given to plebes at West Point:
http://www.theamericanscholar.org/solitude-and-leadership/

plus, from the same lecturer above, why Yale sucks:
http://www.theamericanscholar.org/the-disadvantages-of-an-elite-education/

Friday, January 7, 2011

Utilitarianism in the Long Run

Yesterday, when Rohan tried to use utilitarianism in an argument, he was promptly shut down by Dr. Tisdall. While I see where Dr. Tisdall was coming from, I think we must acknowledge how utilitarianism is interpreted differently between Republicans and Democrats. Over break, I read Justice, a book by Michael Sandel that outlines several philosophies towards society and government. In his chapter on utilitarianism, he outlines the absolutely different ways utilitarianism can be followed in the short run and the long run.

-

Since utilitarianism works to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people, in the short-term, the idea is very liberal. The idea is that $1,000 brings a lot more happiness to a poor man than it takes away from an extremely rich man, so it should be transferred to the poor man. This idea can be continued all the way until the richest man is worth $50,001 and the poorest man is worth $49,999. Since the poorer man will still receive slightly more happiness from the dollar, it should be transferred to him according to utilitarianism. This process thus leads us on a rapid path towards Communism.

-

However, as Dr. Tisdall was alluding to, utilitarianism is very libertarian in the long-term. The idea here is that thirty years from now, regulation and the dilution of incentives hamper economic growth. By freeing the economy and taxpayers, we can become more efficient and productive as a society, increasing economic growth. The rule of 72 illustrates this effect. Therefore, thirty years from now we will be able to witness far higher standards of living for most everyone. As this does the greatest good for the greatest number of people in the long-term, this is truly utilitarian. This process thus leads ua on a rapid path towards pure Capitalism.

-

The topic of utilitarianism is interesting because it shows a fundamental difference between Democrats and Republicans: the short-term vs. long-term. In so many of today’s issues, timing separates the parties. In war, the economy, and society, Republicans are concerned with America’s future. However, in all of these topics, Democrats have been concerned with America in the present. Personally, I favor the long-term, and that plays a large basis in my leaning right. I want an America that is long-lasting and gradual, not one of short bursts. Even if I’m dead, I want my grandchildren to be able to live in a world where the USA rules and democracy roams free.

-

So Democrats like Rohan are wrong in trying to prove a point with utilitarianism. They really should go right ahead and admit they are prioritizing the short-term. This isn’t about some radical social philosophy. No, it’s about Democrats surrendering tomorrow for progress today.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Response to Tisdall's "Money is Overrated"

I think, instead, that we should say "purchasing power" is overrated. Things are overrated.

But money, money is different. If you have one million dollars in even a 3 or 4 percent return investment (or, long ago, a bank with a non-zero interest rate), that gives you $30k +, or the equivalent of a single blue-collar/ min. wage worker.

If you get a bit better, let's say 6%, you never have to work. $60,000 a year, for simply letting others use your money? That's like having two personal workers produce for you, without needing any sustenance, only direction.

All of this can quickly go to hell. Fast. But we should not underestimate what money can do. If anything, money is underrated.

Saturday, January 1, 2011

How to Work with Republicans

In the New York Times, from a Harvard Economist no less:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/business/02view.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

And it's a bit funny that libs actually need to be told this, what, with them being bipartisan and all